SUPERSTRATEGY – probabilistically optimised, frontier-forecasted decisions.

Cassi is a Superstrategy engine that forecasts 50% more accurately than humans, combining AI and collective intelligence to improve decisions.

Media coverage

Who we are. Why we exist.

Cassi pairs collective intelligence, your team's own judgement, made legible and stripped of bias, with frontier AI forecasting. Together, they're more accurate than either alone.

In Greek myth, Cassandra could see the future perfectly. Nobody believed her.

Cassi is built to fix that curse for organisations. It tells you what you need to know, not what you want to hear.

Benchmarks · Live

#1AI on the ForecastBench leaderboard
  1. 1ForecastBenchSuperforecaster median forecastElite humans69.2
  2. 2CassiCassi-2026-05-10#1 AI68.8
  3. 3xAIGrok 4.20 (Beta, C)68.1
  4. 3xAIGrok 4.20 (Beta, D)68.1
  5. 5Google DeepMindgreen tree67.5

23 tournaments entered

ForecastBench leaderboard last updated: 17/07/2026 at 07:31 am

The Forecast Room

Cassi puts numbers on the AI scenario reports everyone's talking about — every resolvable claim, priced and tracked.

88%

UK public continues to favour stronger AI regulation

Likelihood over time

Jul 2026Oct 2026
88%

Question: Will a majority of the UK public support stronger AI regulation in the latest available survey before 1 Jan 28?

Resolves: TRUE if the most recent such survey before the date shows majority support for stronger AI regulation; otherwise FALSE.

Resolution date: 1 Jan 2028

17%

AI-related displacement worsens UK public finances

Likelihood over time

Aug 2026Oct 2026
17%

Question: Will authoritative analysis estimate that AI-related labour displacement worsened UK public finances by at least 1% of GDP in 2030?

Resolves: Will resolve as true if, by 01 Jan 33, the OBR, HM Treasury, IFS or two independent transparent analyses estimate that the net AI-related labour-market effect worsened the 2030 UK fiscal balance by at least 1% of GDP relative to a stated counterfactual. It will otherwise resolve as false.

Resolution date: 1 Jan 2033

42%

A frontier lab demonstrates an autonomous AI researcher

Likelihood over time

Jul 2026Oct 2026
42%

Question: Will a frontier AI lab publicly claim to have deployed a substantially autonomous 'AI researcher' conducting AI R&D before 1 Jan 29?

Resolves: TRUE if, before 1 Jan 2029, a frontier AI lab states in its own published material that it is using an AI system as a substantially autonomous researcher in its AI research and development — meaning the lab characterises the system as selecting its own approaches, designing and running its own experiments, and iterating on results without per-step human direction — and describes this as ongoing use within its research process rather than a bounded experiment. Does not count: capability details appearing incidentally in material whose subject is something else, such as a safety incident, an evaluation result, or a benchmark record; long-running autonomous execution of a human-specified task against a pre-set metric; one-off experiments, demonstrations, or evaluation runs; systems the lab describes as assisting, accelerating, or augmenting its researchers; media characterisations not matched by a statement from the lab. Otherwise FALSE.

Resolution date: 1 Jan 2029

TRUERESOLVED 16 Sept 2026

A single frontier training run exceeds $1 billion

Likelihood over time

Jul 2026Oct 2026
TRUERESOLVED 16 Sept 2026

Question: Will the cost of at least one frontier AI training run exceed US$1 billion before 1 Jan 28?

Resolves: TRUE if Epoch AI or a comparable credible source estimates a single frontier training run above $1bn before the date; otherwise FALSE.

Why it resolved: Wccftech reported that GPT-6 Astra was trained on a 100,000-GPU cluster and estimated four cost scenarios. Its upper scenario—100,000 GPUs × 24 hours × 120 days × $3.50 per GPU-hour—was explicitly calculated at $1.008 billion. This is an estimate for one completed frontier-model training run, exceeds $1 billion, and was published after the question opened and before the deadline. https://wccftech.com/openais-1-billion-gpt-6-astra-heralds-the-age-of-agi-according-to-nvidias-jensen-huang-yet-anthropics-fable-5-1-still-beats-it-on-swe-bench-pro-and-coding-benchmarks/

Resolution date: 1 Jan 2028

Enter The Forecast Room →